What does Miranda v. Arizona require law enforcement to inform individuals of during interrogations?

Miranda v. Arizona established that law enforcement must inform individuals of their constitutional rights during interrogations. This pivotal decision resulted in the formulation of what are now known as "Miranda rights." These rights include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. This requirement aims to ensure that individuals are fully aware of their rights so they can make informed decisions about whether to speak to law enforcement or to seek legal counsel.

The other options, while related to various aspects of the legal system, do not address the specific requirements set forth by the Miranda decision. The right to appeal pertains to the legal process following a trial, the right to a speedy trial concerns the timely administration of justice, and the right to bail deals with pretrial release conditions. None of these are relevant to the context of interrogation and the specific protections mandated by Miranda v. Arizona.